Myths and truths on hospital infection control: knowledge of perioperative nursing of a tertiary hospital

Abstract

Introduction: Infection prevention and control actions are proven to be effective, but Semmelweis' challenge remains, making them routine practices in health institutions. Objective: To diagnose the knowledge of perioperative nursing about the myths and truths of hospital infection control within the operating room environment of a tertiary hospital in the Federal District. Material and Method: This is a cross-sectional, analytical and observational study, making use of a questionnaire consisting of 28 statements (15 truths and 13 falses) concerning infection control in the surgical environment with a three-point scale (I agree, I doubt and I disagree). It covers issues related to the patient, to surgical team, to the environment and to perioperative procedures. Results and Discussion: We obtained 67% of appropriate responses and 32% inadequate. This indicates how unsatisfactory the level of knowledge of perioperative nursing on infection control is. The myths and rituals are detectable by the high percentage of inappropriate answers in the following areas: use of surgical shoe covers, wedding band and personal items considered as a pathogen, surgical brushing of hands, humid gown and surgical area, infected surgery and cleaning routine, specification of the use of gloves, surgical site infection and time postoperative.